Skip to content

Conversation

@kilfoyle
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts a docs change from #129128, thereby removing this new "Remove index block API" section. The docs will be added to the API spec instead.


rollover-action-note

@kilfoyle kilfoyle added >docs General docs changes v9.0.0 labels Jun 27, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 27, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs:

🔔 The preview site may take up to 3 minutes to finish building. These links will become live once it completes.

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Docs Meta label for docs team label Jun 27, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (Team:Docs)

@kilfoyle kilfoyle changed the title [Docs] Revert addition of 'Remove index block AP' [Docs] Revert addition of 'Remove index block API' Jun 27, 2025
@kilfoyle kilfoyle requested a review from lcawl June 27, 2025 18:37
Copy link
Contributor

@nielsbauman nielsbauman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks David!

Copy link
Contributor

@lcawl lcawl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM since the API docs will be generated per elastic/elasticsearch-specification#4684

@kilfoyle
Copy link
Contributor Author

As discussed in Slack, I've expanded this to also remove the Add index block API section.

@kilfoyle kilfoyle merged commit d3f042e into elastic:main Jun 27, 2025
9 checks passed
mridula-s109 pushed a commit to mridula-s109/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2025
* Revert addition of 'Remove index block AP'

* Also remove 'Add index block API'
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

>docs General docs changes Team:Docs Meta label for docs team v9.0.0 v9.2.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants